Dear Friends,

Some attachments / pdf files at our site are locked due to a recent Google security update & they need to be unlocked one by one, manually

We regret to inform you that the priority will be given to major content contributors only

In the meantime, please feel free to browse all the rest of the articles & documents here

All The Best
Site Caretakers
Armenians-1915.blogspot.com

27.10.06

1182) Imagining Turkish Nation Through ‘Othering’ Armenians by Ayla Gol

Department of International Relations, The London School of Economics and
Political Science, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, UK

ABSTRACT
National identities are socially constructed and inherently relational, such that collective imagination depends on a dialectical opposition to another identity. The ontology of otherness becomes the necessary basis of social imagination.

National identity can hardly be imagined without a narrative of myths, and the Turkish nation is no exception. This article argues that the Turkish nation was imagined as a modern nation with territorial sovereignty after the erosion of traditional Ottoman umma (religious community) identity. During the process of this imagination, the Armenians became the first ‘others’, whose claims over eastern Anatolia were perceived as a real threat to Turkish territoriality and identity. Based on the analysis of modernist theories of nationalism, the methodological concern of this study is twofold:

to explore the causal link between the policies of Ottoman modernisation and the emergence of Turkish nationalism; and to incorporate the self and other nexus into the relationship between the emergence of Turkish nationalism and the process of ‘othering’ the Armenians. .

Introduction

Every nation claims to be unique and to have a different identity from others. National identity can hardly be imagined without a narrative of myths, and the Turkish nation is no exception. The homogeneity of a nation is itself a myth that becomes the basis of many nationalist ideologies. Challenging these myths requires a critical approach to understanding history and nationalism.

The past we accept as an integral part of our social memories and collective identities is subjective and selective in accordance with the requirements of nationalist ideologies. The theoretical departure point of this article is that national identities are socially constructed and inherently relational, such that collective imagination depends on a dialectical opposition to another identity.

The ontology of otherness becomes the necessary basis of social imagination.

Nations and Nationalism 11 (1), 2005, 121–139. r ASEN 2005

Please view The Full Document:
Imagining Turkish Nation Through "Othering" Armenians

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Please Update/Correct Any Of The
3700+ Posts by Leaving Your Comments Here


- - - YOUR OPINION Matters To Us - - -

We Promise To Publish Them Even If We May Not Share The Same View

Mind You,
You Would Not Be Allowed Such Freedom In Most Of The Other Sites At All.

You understand that the site content express the author's views, not necessarily those of the site. You also agree that you will not post any material which is false, hateful, threatening, invasive of a person’s privacy, or in violation of any law.

- Please READ the POST FIRST then enter YOUR comment in English by referring to the SPECIFIC POINTS in the post and DO preview your comment for proper grammar /spelling.
-Need to correct the one you have already sent?
please enter a -New Comment- We'll keep the latest version
- Spammers: Your comment will appear here only in your dreams

More . . :
http://armenians-1915.blogspot.com/2007/05/Submit-Your-Article.html

All the best