Dear Friends,

Some attachments / pdf files at our site are locked due to a recent Google security update & they need to be unlocked one by one, manually

We regret to inform you that the priority will be given to major content contributors only

In the meantime, please feel free to browse all the rest of the articles & documents here

All The Best
Site Caretakers
Armenians-1915.blogspot.com

13.5.06

662) XX: Armenians Join Hitlers Nazi Cause Ten Years To Help Nazis Attempt To Conquer The World : Secrets Of "Christian" Terrorist State Armenia

. .
Although the Armenians were saying whatever they thought necessary to please the Turks and stop their attack, their paid agents around the Christian world began organizing "crusade" campaigns to secure Western support. Hovannissian states that "the war between the Turkish Nationalists and Armenia was fought against a backdrop of protest and supplication. Armenophile societies deplored with raised voices the abandonment of Armenia, insisting that the `civilized world` was duty-bound to save the martyred Armenian people from final collapse and obliteration. The pro-Armenian groups sometimes embarrassed or troubled the Western governments, but in the end they were unsuccessful in altering the Allied decision to avoid armed intervention to halt the Turkish offensive» (1)

The entire world can be thankful the Western governments ignored such pleas in 1920. Consider Hovannissian’s words – "a backdrop of protest and supplication" - "the civilized world was duty-bound to save the martyred Armenian people". Prayers and

supplications are offered up in churches across America. One has to wonder if such is the case within Armenia? The Christian world is "duty-bound" to save the "martyrs" of Armenia. Christ was a martyr. Stephen was a martyr. Countless martyrs were murdered because of their faith in Christ in the first centuries of Christianity. To compare the dictator-terrorist state of Armenia to these true martyrs is blasphemy.

The League of Nations was organized at about this time. The Armenian dictator terrorists begged to become a member. The League said a flat "no" to this terrorist regime.

"The Armenia-Soviet negotiations in Moscow following the ‘sovietization` of Azerbaijan, lead to a total reassessment of Armenia by the British Foreign Office. Written in their reports were many disparaging remarks about the Armenians – their untrustworthiness, their false alarms, their double-dealings, and their knack for placing the blame for their own shortcomings on others. During the Turkish invasion, the Armenians repeatedly demanded Allied military intervention and made it seem that they could have repelled the Turkish armies but for having been abandoned by the West» (P 294)

The British had practical experience with the Armenians. They knew they had a good reason to have these opinions because they were based on fact.

In the United States the Armenian paid agents and their sponsored and organized American Armenian "pro-Armenian lobby" also cast about for ways to salvage the Armenians. The American Committee for the Independence of Armenia (ACIA) became increasingly alienated from Woodrow Wilson. James Gerard and Vakan Cardashian bitterly accused the president of politicizing the mandate issue for personal gain and of unnecessarily delaying for weeks his decision on the Armenians boundaries, ultimately informing the Allied powers only at the end of November 1920.

This same ACIA official, James Gerard, just before the November elections wrote to Bainbridge Colby, Secretary of State to tell him that the Senate resolution of 1919 "authorized the

president to dispatch an American warship with marines to Batum. Gerard asked that at least this small measure of relief now be implemented» (P 301]

The defeat of the Armenian army by the Turkish Nationalists in the fall of 1920 served to enhance the decisive expressions recorded in the [British] Foreign Office. The minutes of Dwight Osborne and Randal McDowell brimmed with sarcasm about the cowardliness, unworthiness, and pretentiousness of the Armenians, who continued to clamor about their right to the Turkish Armenian provinces at a time when, despite having been armed by the British, they were unable to hold on to the Russian Armenian districts that constituted the existing state. As the minutes were passed upward to the senior officials, the comments became more tense and guarded yet continued to reveal irritation with the Armenian problem and the Armenians themselves (P 304)

While the Turks were moving forward, the Armenians were sending their paid agents all over the Christian world in an effort to get support. Case in point is London. Dwight Osborne recorded that he told the Armenian who just showed up at the Foreign Office "that the foreign secretary might be too occupied to grant a personal interview». In his minutes on this exchange, Osborne, reflecting the annoyance that had grown up in the Foreign Office, suggested what might be said to the Armenian if the Foreign Secretary should see him.

It is possible that Lord Curzon might think it worth while to point out... `that Armenian propaganda is defeating its own object, that H.M.G. is not a charity organization and that instead of perpetual appeals for foreign pity and assistance we should like to see evidence of some self-reliance and political ability in Armenia; that the continued existence of Armenia as an autonomous state is dependent on Armenian efforts and capacity and cannot be based on foreign armies and foreign money; that we will supply fuel for transport and military equipment for their Army but they must provide from the numerous and rich Armenian Colonies abroad the men an money to defend and establish their country on a sound footing; that, once and for all, we cannot send an army to assist them and we cannot spare any troops for Trebizond nor do we consider that to do so would save Armenia; that we view this reiterated demand for the occupation of Trebizond with some suspicion especially when it is accompanied by the suggestion that the Armenians themselves hope shortly to be able to send some of their troops there; that the surrender ofKars and the reported establishment of a Soviet government at Alexandrople strengthen our doubts of the capacity of Armenia to maintain an independent existence; that it is clearly futile to press for our [de jure] recognition of Armenian independence when Armenia is neither politically, financially nor militarily independent and has no frontiers to recognize; finally that we fully appreciate and sympathize with Armenia’s sufferings in the past, have done and will continue to do in the future what is possible, within reason, to assist and support her, but that what we want to see now is concrete evidence of some constructive and administrative ability at home instead of a purely external policy based on propaganda and mendicancy (P 304-305)

This British Foreign Service officer hit the nail on the head. The Armenian leaders had no real political organization. Their so-called army was ineffective when it faced real opposition. The only thing these Armenians had done well was launch a worldwide propaganda campaign. Because there was no Muslim population to speak of in these countries, the spinning of Armenian tall tales was taken as truth. It is a sad commentary that neither Christian organizations nor this government made an independent investigation into Armenian allegations.

When Armenia begged the League of Nations to take them in as a member, the answer was no. Only eight of the forty-one nations present voted to admit the "professional beggars" of Armenia as a member state

As the dust settled and the Turks occupied lands that were a part of their "historic homeland," the Armenians gave way. "The Armenians had expressed the desire to live in harmony and equality with their Muslim compatriots and to conclude a peace treaty advantageous to both sides. In reality, however, the Armenian government in its two years of existence had persecuted and decimated the Turkish-Muslim population in the areas wrongfully attached to the Armenian Republic. The Turkish government had engaged in the recent war in order to defend the territorial integrity of the nation and to stop the Armenian excesses» (P 371)

Armenians today have the same spirit and the same attitude as their terrorist dictator forefathers. At the first opportunity [1992] Armenia launched a sneak attack on Azerbaijan and removed more than 1 million Muslims in a late twentieth century land grab in the name of Christianity. Most of these Muslims live in horrible conditions in tent cities, thanks to today’s Christian Armenians who took their homes and lands without compensation of any kind.

Meanwhile back in 1920, "While the Armenian government and peace delegation agonized over the Turkish demands and the threat of renewed hostilities, Soviet strategists came to the decision that the time had arrived to effect the Sovietization of Armenia» (P 373)

"The Republic of Armenia was transformed into the Socialist Soviet Republic of Armenia by their agreement of December 2, 1920, although November 29 soon became the official and only recognized date in Armenia and the entire Soviet Union» (P 390)

The Armenian bandits became willing Communists without firing a shot. It is of interest to know that even though the "Soviet Armenian government initiated steps to incorporate mountainous Karabagh, however most but not all of the region was constituted as an autonomous district (ablast) of Soviet Azerbaijan» (P 399)

Hovannissian ends his four-volume series with this statement: "The first independent Armenian state in more than half a millennium thus passed into history. Yet this legacy was compelling and through the vicissitudes of the twentieth century continued to inspire the hope and vision that someday liberty and sovereignty would be restored, this time in a more resourceful, formidable, and fortunate Republic of Armenia» (P 408)

"Liberty and sovereignty" to be restored. This definition does not fit into the Western terms of these words, yet, if this gaggle of a tiny band of people continue to carry out acts of terror, as was done in the first two and a half years they were in existence, there will never be a liberty and sovereignty but a continuation of a pathetic continuation of land-grab attempts of their forefathers.

The Nazis and Their Armenian Supporters

When World War I began in 1914, the widely scattered people calling themselves "Armenians" were at the forefront of being disloyal to the Ottoman government with whom they had lived in peace for more than five hundred years. The Armenians "claimed" to have been among the first supporters of the victorious Allies who were at war with Germany.

After World War I ended, Armenians claimed lands and existed as a terrorist state until the mid-1920s when they entered into a peaceful agreement and became a part of the Soviet Union.

In the early 1930s Adolf Hitler came to power in Germany. This is the same Germany the Armenians "claimed" to have fought some thirteen years earlier. In typical Armenian fashion, this tiny state cut a deal with the Nazis because they thought they would win World War II, which was just beginning. Armenian General Dro Kanayan, famous for his many successful attacks against unarmed Muslim villages, joined the German war efforts. The 812th Armenian Legion and Armenian battalion were organized. It would grow to become twenty thousand soldiers strong. This battalion fought with the Germans in the Crimea, the North Caucasus, and Holland.

The soldiers of the battalion were assigned a special duty in keeping with Armenian past military skills. Many Armenian soldiers were used as police units in newly captured and occupied lands. The soldiers were assigned to spy out and capture all Jews and other undesirable elements as listed by the Germans. Once a sizeable number of individuals were captured, the Armenians herded them together and marched them to the concentration camps that became so infamous for the mass massacre of millions of Jews.

By August 1935, Armenian newspapers were publishing pro-German articles. The Armenian press could not praise Hitler enough. The following are just a few of the many examples of the Armenian press slobbering all over Hitler and the Nazis.

On May 10, 1935, Hairenik Weekly published a statement made by the vice-Mayor of Bucharest, Romania: "The Armenians have helped us Romanians not to become slaves of the Jewish elements». History has recorded that Romania was in the forefront of anti-Semitic states within the Nazi occupied lands.

On August 9, 1935 ,the Hairenik Weekly explained that the reason Armenians and Greeks killed so many Jews in Salonica was because of Jewish love of gain.

The Daily Hairenik, not to be outdone by the Weekly Hairenik, joined in supporting the German cause. On August 19, 1936: "Sometimes it is difficult to eradicate these poisonous elements [Jews] when they have struck deep root like a chronic disease, and when it becomes necessary for a people (Nazis) to eradicate them in an uncommon method these attempts are regarded as revolutionary. During a surgical operation, the flow of blood is a natural thing. Under such conditions dictatorship seems to have the role of a savior».

The very next day, this Armenian newspaper published the statement, "Jews being the most fanatical nationalists and race-worshiper, are compelled to create an atmosphere of internationalism and world-citizenship in order to preserve their race. As British use battleships to occupy lands, the Jews use internationalism or communism as a weapon». Consider the fact that just eighteen years before the Armenians were begging arms, ammunition and military supplies from these same British they now attack on behalf of Germany.

On September 17, 1936, the Hairenik praised Hitler and the Germans: "and came [to power] Adolph Hitler after Herculean struggles. He spoke to the racial heart strings of the German, opened the fountain if his national genius».

The September 25, 1936, edition of the newspaper published: "…the type of Jews who are imported to Palestine is not anything to be proud about. They have loose morals and vices.... And on top of all, their Communist activities were the cause of most of the Arab criticism».

This issue of the Hairenik was printed in English and edited by Armenians living in Boston, Massachusetts. Perhaps this is the reason the Armenian Revolutionary Federation’s archives in Boston are not open to the public for research work. Perhaps the Armenians do not want fair and honest historians to examine the records of their active support for Nazi Germany during World War II.

In 1942, many Armenian youth were recruited and were active in support of the Nazi war effort. Suren Bezzadian Paikhar organized and led the Armenian National Socialist movement called Hoassank (which means "lighting"). This organization became popular throughout Europe and with young Armenians living in Turkey.

By late 1942 this organization merged with the Armenian National Council. Several Armenian Revolutionary Federation leaders founded this organization.

Karekin Nezhdeh, an Armenian general founded Armenian Tseghagron, a racist organization through which Armenian young people flowed to the infamous Nazi SS and other elite German military forces.

Armenian support for Nazi Germany was widespread. Armenians living in Germany and France joined the 58th Panzer Corps and the Ostlegion of the Wehrmacht’s 10th Army in large numbers.

Armenian Revolutionary Federation leaders worked closely with German Military Intelligence. The Armenians did for Germany what they first did best for the Russians in World War I – spying. From mid 1941 until September 1944 the Armenians worked closely with Nazi intelligence offices in Turkey and throughout the Middle East. Armenian "secret" agents worked to spread German propaganda and helped the Nazis run down and locate Jews.

During the early years of the war Armenian leaders thought Germany would win the war. They made every effort to cut a deal for the Germans to give them Russian and Turkish lands.

Once the tide of battle of World War II changed and began to flow toward an Allies victory; the Armenian chameleons jumped the German ship and swam like drowning rats. They began to denounce the Germans, then groveled before the Allies just as they had done before the Germans. These were the same Allies who just a few years before which the Armenians claimed owed them Russian and Turkish lands.

Countless Armenians were in collusion with the Nazis and Hitler. They helped in the extermination of Jews during World War II. These Armenians were important in their actions and were very valuable to the Nazi war efforts in creating what became known in 1948 as the "holocaust».

There can be no question about the massive Armenian support for Nazi Germany during World War II. What is incredible is that once the Armenians saw that Germany was going to lose the war, they switched sides.

After the war, the Armenians claimed that Hitler made statements about them being massacred in 1915. This is a false claim and fake evidence was submitted that has been exposed as being a forgery.

The Armenians, for ten years from the early 1930s until 1944, actively supported Hitler and the Nazis. After the war the Armenians attempt to "claim" Hitler was against them. But there is more much more that Armenians have yet to answer for regarding their active cooperation with Hitler and the Nazis. Rutgers

University’s Journal of Law and Religion is in the process of using the Internet to post newly discovered Nuremberg Nazi war crimes trial evidence. These published documents pose both questions and answers about Armenian involvement and support of Adolph Hitler, the Nazis, and Germany before and during World War II.

The online documents provide proof that Nazi Germany wanted to eliminate Christianity and the church and substitute it with a purely Aryan racial religion designed to meet the needs of their National Socialist political movement. The Nazis infiltrated churches and worked to discredit leading church members. Other Christians were singled out and jailed while other Christians were murdered. The Nazi attitude toward Christians was no secret in Nazi Germany nor in the territories captured and occupied by the them – with Armenian help, that they were anti church and anti-Christian.

Is this why Armenia has ethically cleansed its own tiny state and why almost 95 percent of everyone now living in this small place are pure "Aryan Armenian"? Perhaps this is why more than 1 million people have fled from Armenia between 1992 and 2002.

Is this why Armenia makes it all but impossible for any other Christian faith but their Armenian official state church to operate in their tiny state?

How can the Christian world keep on pumping billions of dollars into such a tiny place where the people have such a convincing record of promoting racial purity and persecution of anyone who Isn’t "white" or any Christian faith different from official Armenian?

Armenians call upon Turkey to apologize for their self called genocide of 1915. How can Armenia do such a thing without first apologizing for supporting the Nazis during World War II and their role in the massacre of many thousand Jews?

Why hasn’t the official, state-controlled Armenian church condemned these anti-Christian actions of the 1930s and early 1940s?

Not only is it not in the Armenians character to admit their mistakes and wrongs of the past they even steal other peoples ideas. For example: Even though the Armenians helped the Nazis capture defenseless Jews and march them off to the camps, today the Armenians have established what they call the Armenian Genocide Museum and Memorial two blocks from the White House in Washington D.C.

The director of planning for this museum made a public speech on November 9, 2001, in Toronto, Canada. The director stated, "It is our intent to involve Armenians throughout our far flung Diaspora in the planning and financing of this multi-million-dollar effort».

Note the use of the word "diaspora». Webster defines the word "diaspora" as "the dispersion of the Jews after the Babylonian exile. The Jews thus dispersed. The places where they settled. Any scattering of people with a common origin, background and beliefs». Clearly this is an effort to compare themselves to the great horrors suffered by the Jews when they were a part of the persecution of said Jews.

American Armenians are very proud of Armenian support of the Nazis during World War II. Proof of this is the fact that they raised money to dig up the deceased General Dro Kanayan, who was buried in the United States, and gave him a hero’s burial in Armenia.

Armenia has also honored General Dro Kanayan by establishing a leadership institute to train the youth of the state. The Armenian American community in California held a fundraiser to support the Dro Leadership Institute. What is Armenia teaching its youth in the name of this Armenian Nazi leader?.

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Please Update/Correct Any Of The
3700+ Posts by Leaving Your Comments Here


- - - YOUR OPINION Matters To Us - - -

We Promise To Publish Them Even If We May Not Share The Same View

Mind You,
You Would Not Be Allowed Such Freedom In Most Of The Other Sites At All.

You understand that the site content express the author's views, not necessarily those of the site. You also agree that you will not post any material which is false, hateful, threatening, invasive of a person’s privacy, or in violation of any law.

- Please READ the POST FIRST then enter YOUR comment in English by referring to the SPECIFIC POINTS in the post and DO preview your comment for proper grammar /spelling.
-Need to correct the one you have already sent?
please enter a -New Comment- We'll keep the latest version
- Spammers: Your comment will appear here only in your dreams

More . . :
http://armenians-1915.blogspot.com/2007/05/Submit-Your-Article.html

All the best